Judging process

Our independent judging process is designed to ensure every entry is assessed fairly, consistently and without bias. Learn how judges are selected, how entries are scored and what happens at each stage of the awards.

Join the leaders shaping the UK’s technology ecosystem

Senior leaders from enterprise organisations, technology vendors, consultancies and partners come together to recognise the year’s most outstanding achievements.

Our judging principles

Fair
Every entry is judged equally
Independent
Judge without bias or commercial influence
Confidential
Keep entries and discussions confidential
Transparent
Declare conflicts of interest
Collaborative
Final decisions are made together
Your role as a judge
What you gain

Our Judge Timeline

2026

Nominations open
1st September
All judges to be confirmed
30th October

2027

Review and score nominations online
11th-22nd January
Shortlist announced
10th February
Judge Roundtable
Meet fellow judges in London to agree winners
9th March
In-person show
Celebrate with finalists, judges and sponsors
28th April

Our 2026 Judge Breakdown

19

C-Suite

20

Tech Leaders

4

Sales Leaders

1

Marketing Lead

21

Directors

2

Other

2026 Judges Roundtable

Judging Process FAQs

How are the judges selected?

The judges are selected from a diverse range of senior leaders and advocates across the ecosystems in which we operate. Judges are confirmed in three ways: through applications, through our sponsors, who receive a judging place as part of their sponsorship package, and through referrals from Tenth Revolution Group employees.

All judges are external and cannot be employed by Tenth Revolution Group, helping to ensure the judging process remains independent, impartial and free from internal bias.

How are the judges selected?

Judges are allocated to judging panels of up to 12 people, with each panel responsible for evaluating up to four award categories.

  • During the allocation process, we make every effort to avoid assigning judges to panels where there may be a conflict of interest. However, this is not always possible.
  • If a judge has a conflict of interest relating to a category assigned to their panel, they will be recused from judging that category. They may continue to judge the other categories assigned to their panel.

There are two stages to our judging process: Longlist Scoring and Shortlist Roundtables.

Longlist Scoring

  • Judges review all nominations submitted through the nomination platform for each category they have been allocated.
  • Each judge selects their top five nominations and ranks them from first to fifth place.
  • Points are then awarded based on each judge’s ranking. A first-place nomination receives five points, second place receives four points, continuing down to one point for fifth place.
  • The scores from all judges are combined, with the highest-scoring nominations progressing to the shortlist.

Shortlist Roundtables

  • Each judging panel meets either in person or virtually to discuss the shortlisted nominations and agree on a winner for each category assigned to the panel.

  • If a judge has a conflict of interest relating to a category, they will be recused from the discussion and will leave the room, or virtual meeting, while that category is being considered.

  • A moderator and proctor from Tenth Revolution Group are assigned to each panel. Their role is to facilitate the discussion, ensure every judge has the opportunity to contribute and confirm that the panel has reached an agreement on the winner.

  • The moderator and proctor remain fully impartial throughout the process and have no influence over judging decisions.

    Winners are announced at the in-person awards ceremony.

Judge applications are now closed for 2026